首页> 外文OA文献 >Students’ learning styles compared with their teachers’ learning styles in upper secondary school – a mismatched combination.
【2h】

Students’ learning styles compared with their teachers’ learning styles in upper secondary school – a mismatched combination.

机译:与高中老师的学习风格相比,学生的学习风格是不匹配的。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The background to this study is the large number of students who fail to finish upper secondary school with passing grades. The overall aim of this study was to examine one parameter in the didactic interaction between teachers and students, namely the differences and similarities in learning styles. This study compares therefore teachers' and students´ learning styles profiles at the two major orientations in upper secondary school. The study involved 53 secondary school teachers and 101 high school students randomly selected. The learning styles assessment PEPS was used to identify 20 different traits. Three groups were compared and analyzed by using F-test and analysis of variance, ANOVA. The statistical analysis showed that the teachers have a greater need for light and temperature, are more motivated, more confirmative, have less need for structure and authority and are more alert in the morning and less in the afternoon compared with the students. The two student groups showed no statistically significant differences between them. The results are of value for people involved in the planning of teacher education, practicing teachers and students themselves. The results indicate the need for expanded educational strategies and an in-depth didactic discussion of the practical activities.
机译:这项研究的背景是大量的学生未能通过合格的高中毕业。这项研究的总体目标是检验教师和学生之间的教学互动中的一个参数,即学习方式的差异和相似性。因此,本研究比较了高中两个主要方向的教师和学生的学习风格概况。该研究涉及随机选择的53名中学教师和101名高中学生。学习风格评估PEPS用于识别20个不同的特征。使用F检验和方差分析(ANOVA)对三组进行比较和分析。统计分析表明,与学生相比,教师对光线和温度的需求更大,更有动力,更具确定性,对结构和权威的需求更少,并且早晨和下午的警觉性更高。这两个学生群体之间没有统计学差异。结果对于参与教师教育计划的人员,实践教师和学生本身具有价值。结果表明需要扩大教育策略,并需要对实践活动进行深入的教学讨论。

著录项

  • 作者

    Boström, Lena;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号